When parents prepare an estate plan, the first question is usually who will inherit the assets they have worked hard to build. But another question deserves just as much thought: What will happen to those assets after the children receive them?
Even financially responsible adults can experience a lawsuit, divorce, business failure, or unexpected debt. Parents may want to leave assets to their children without unnecessarily exposing the entire inheritance to those risks.
I am Trenton Nield, a California estate planning attorney and founder of Nield Legacy Law. One planning approach I discuss with families is a continuing trust for a child, often called an inheritance protection trust. The name describes the goal, but the protections depend on exactly how the trust is written and administered.
What exactly is an inheritance protection trust?
An inheritance protection trust is a trust structure intended to hold assets for a beneficiary's ongoing benefit instead of distributing the full inheritance directly into the beneficiary's personal name. It is not a special type of trust that automatically receives broad immunity from creditors.
Often, parents can include the provisions in their own revocable living trust. After the parents' deaths, each child's share can continue as a separate irrevocable trust under the distribution and trustee provisions the parents selected.
The child may receive substantial benefits from the inheritance, but the assets remain legally held by the trustee, and distributions must follow the trust terms. With properly drafted spendthrift and discretionary provisions, that distinction can be significant.
A $2 million inheritance: outright versus in trust
Suppose a mother leaves her daughter $2 million. Under an outright distribution, the daughter receives the full amount personally. She can use it freely, but the funds generally become part of the assets she owns and may be exposed to personal liabilities.
Alternatively, the mother can direct that the daughter's $2 million share remain in a separate trust for her benefit. Depending on the provisions, the trustee may use trust property for housing, health care, education, living costs, and other permitted needs.
The daughter can still benefit from the money; the difference is that she may not have an unrestricted right to withdraw the entire $2 million. This distinction can offer safeguards, especially when distributions remain subject to genuine trustee discretion and appropriate restrictions.
The protection is not absolute. A creditor's access depends on California law, the beneficiary's actual rights, the nature of the claim, and whether any trust assets have already been distributed.
1. Potential protection against certain creditor claims
Imagine the daughter is involved in a serious automobile accident years after inheriting. A substantial personal judgment against her would not automatically mean a creditor owns the assets held in a properly structured third-party inheritance trust.
Under California law, valid spendthrift provisions and discretionary distributions may limit a creditor's remedies. But California statutes recognize important exceptions and circumstances in which creditors may reach amounts payable or available from a trust, including particular claims and statutory limits.
A trustee's independence and actual control matter. Giving the beneficiary unfettered authority to withdraw or distribute the inheritance may defeat the intended safeguards. Trust terms must be chosen with careful attention to these issues.
2. Keeping inherited assets separate in the event of divorce
California law generally treats property received by gift or inheritance as a spouse's separate property. Even so, disputes may arise if inherited funds are commingled with marital assets, used to buy jointly titled property, or otherwise handled in ways that make ownership and tracing difficult.
Keeping an inheritance in a separate trust can help maintain more distinct ownership and management records. A trustee can administer and distribute assets under the parent's instructions instead of depositing the full inheritance into the beneficiary's personal accounts.
A trust is not a blanket shield against all family law orders, reimbursement claims, support obligations, or court decisions. The benefits depend on the precise facts and trust design.
3. A backstop for business or financial setbacks
Your child may build a successful business, personally guarantee a loan, suffer an investment loss, or encounter other debt obligations. Even careful people experience financial setbacks.
An inheritance held in a thoughtfully designed third-party trust may provide greater separation from a child's personal finances than an outright distribution. The goal is to preserve resources for the child's long-term well-being where legally possible, rather than to make the funds unusable.
Trustees must administer the trust honestly and according to its terms. An inheritance protection trust is not a device for evading existing creditors through fraudulent transfers or disguising the beneficiary's unrestricted property.
4. Preserving part of a legacy for grandchildren
Many families want an inheritance to support their children while also preserving what remains for grandchildren. Continuing trusts can be designed to do both.
The trust can authorize appropriate lifetime distributions to a child and direct remaining property to that child's descendants upon death. Parents may also specify what should happen when a child dies without descendants or another beneficiary cannot take a gift.
This arrangement can be especially helpful for families with a home, business interests, or investments intended to provide support across generations. It also requires thoughtful trustee succession and administration provisions.
5. Will my child still be able to use the money?
Yes, if the trust is drafted to authorize the intended benefits. Terms might allow distributions for a home purchase, medical needs, education, support, family circumstances, or other needs consistent with the trust's stated purposes.
However, there is an important balance. The more unrestricted control a beneficiary receives, the weaker certain asset-protection benefits may become. Some families use an independent trustee for discretionary decisions; others use carefully limited co-trustee arrangements.
A child acting as trustee can sometimes have constrained powers tied to an ascertainable standard, but tax, fiduciary, and creditor consequences must be evaluated. The best trustee structure depends on the beneficiaries and assets, not a single formula.
6. Are inheritance protection trusts only for wealthy families?
No. In California, a family home and retirement savings may represent a substantial inheritance even if the family would not describe itself as wealthy.
That said, continuing trusts are not free of tradeoffs. They may require ongoing trustee work, recordkeeping, tax filings, professional fees, and rules that a beneficiary finds less convenient than outright ownership.
For some children and families, an outright distribution is the right answer. The decision should weigh the size and nature of the inheritance, family dynamics, age and circumstances of beneficiaries, and whether continued administration is justified.
7. Can these provisions be added to an existing living trust?
Often they can. During a parent's lifetime, their revocable living trust typically remains amendable while they have capacity. The distribution provisions can provide that, after death, a child's inheritance stays in a separate continuing trust rather than being paid out immediately.
Merely establishing a revocable living trust does not protect the parent's own property from the parent's creditors while the parent can revoke it. The potential inheritance protections arise from the later third-party trust arrangement for the beneficiary and its enforceable restrictions.
If you already have an estate plan, a review may determine whether it distributes children's shares outright and whether continuing trust provisions would fit your goals.
Why I encourage parents to consider the question
I do not believe an inheritance protection trust is the automatic answer for every family. But when clients come to Nield Legacy Law, I want them to know they have a choice between leaving property outright and establishing instructions that continue beyond their lifetime.
This is not about assuming that children will be irresponsible. It is about recognizing that circumstances can change over a lifetime and deciding whether you want a level of protection and stewardship built into your estate plan.
If you are preparing or updating a California living trust, I would be glad to discuss the advantages, limitations, cost, and practical implications of continuing trusts for your children during an estate planning consultation.
For the broader foundation, read why California homeowners consider living trusts.
For an overview of attorney Trenton Nield's professional background and approach, visit the Nield Legacy Law attorney biography. You can also explore the firm's other California estate planning articles.
This article is general educational information, not individualized legal or tax advice. The application of California law depends on the facts and current law. Contacting or reading content from Nield Legacy Law does not by itself establish an attorney-client relationship.

